"People have been allowed to get away with . . . making statements that they knew weren't factual….Washington games are still being played with the truth."
--Robert Gibbs, White House Press Secretary
Politicians and political advocates (or adversaries) will speak lies. Often, it’s not just bending the truth to fit an agenda, but flat out making things up. That, alas, we’ve come to expect.
But what responsibility do journalists have when they know someone is misstating the facts? I think they need to – at the very least – challenge liars or even folks who unintentionally state the wrong facts.
We see a prime example of that with The Washington Post’s Mike Shear and Virginia Republican Congressman Eric Canto. Shear is a good reporter, and I don’t think he has a bias, at least not one that regularly comes through in his reporting. But I can’t understand why he – and he is not alone on this; he’s just a recent example –allows Cantor to make a knowingly false statement in a story last Sunday.
"Remember the promises? They promised you that if you paid for their stimulus, jobs would be created immediately," Cantor said. "In fact, they said that unemployment would stay under 8 percent. Yet just months later, they are telling us to brace for unemployment to climb over 10 percent. They promised jobs created. Now they scramble to find a way to play games with government numbers by claiming jobs saved."
When I read this, I knew Cantor was not truthful. The administration hadn’t said it would stay below 8 percent; it was 8.5 percent. Is that a relatively small difference? You be the judge. But it was clearly inaccurate and Shear knew it.
Why do I know he knew it? Here is Shear writing today.
Obama's team had predicted that the stimulus package would keep unemployment to a peak of about 8.5 percent, but the rate soared to 9.5 percent last month….
If Shear know Cantor was misstating the fact, why did he use the lie in his Sunday story?
I have objections to journalists reporting some positions that are not clearly defensible. One is the myth that “small businesses” create most of the jobs in this country. The other myth is that higher tax rates on incomes of more than $250,000 impact small business people the most because their profits are reported to the IRS on their individual tax returns, when in fact less that two percent of small business owners make over $250,000. Moreover, of the 600,000+ small business making over $250,000 (which includes companies as large as 500 employees) many of them are sole proprietorships that have no employees (lawyers, accountants, consultants, etc.); hence a greater tax on them doesn’t cost jobs.
But when a politician misstates a fact of who said what when, the role of a reporter is to say “that’s not true,” and either point that out in the article or refuse to report the misstatement.
Gibbs is right, but that probably won’t change anything.
Absolutely right. But I'm not optimistic that anything will change journalistically any time soon. So I propose progressives not stretch the truth, but talk in brOad themes and challenge both the media and the GOP.
If anything, reporters want to be right, and if we criticize them enough, we can get our view point in the story. BUT WE HAVE TO TRY!!!
Posted by: Bob Griendling | July 17, 2009 at 04:41 PM
Why let the truth get in the way when a lie will do? And if you repeat it often enough, it becomes truth, right?
Posted by: Vivian J. Paige | July 17, 2009 at 04:12 PM